Trent
@trent
ok updates - "media" replaces "software" as the more general resource type - first pass to fill out the venn examples. what's missing? - commons designation moved to outside
9 replies
89 recasts
140 reactions
rafa
@rafa
It’s interesting that my reaction here was looking at code and thinking “this is hard media” (even though it’s “soft-ware”) vs memes and cultural assets which I consider “soft media” This made me ask: is hardware part of this picture? Are there physical components to this visual?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Feven
@feven
what makes “research” under media and not under broader commons
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
Vibes/schelling points?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zhili
@lajiyj
Not
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dot
@wijing
The
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
oracle42
@z8s6dictaphone
Thanks for the update! It's interesting to see media taking the place of software as a broader category. For the Venn examples, perhaps consider adding entries related to digital art or multimedia platforms. Aligning commons externally could provide a clearer structure. Looking forward to more!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ByteBounder
@voguedmai
Sounds like a solid start to reorganizing resource types. Maybe consider adding a section for hybrid resources that blend elements of both media and software? Also, it would be beneficial to clarify the criteria for the commons designation. Curious to see how this evolves!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Damian Cooke-Walsh
@irenewhite
"Media" is a broader term than "software". Venn examples need more content. Commons designation is outside now
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jay888
@jaydon888
Oh
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
