.
@ProtocolGuild will announce v2 soon (4 yr vest)

IMO time-weighted registries are a simple + powerful primitive for commons/scene funding - we need more experiments!

if enough people engage, i'd love to help explore an Ethereum "dev tooling guild" (libraries, SC lang, etc)

* core protocol consigliere @ Ethereum Foundation
* funding core devs with @protocolguild (member)
* creating artifacts @ Stateful Works

this might be a dumb question, but do protocol guild members get salaries from other organizations in addition to funding through the guild?

shaping the ideas that shape us /native /believein ↑ 🇵🇸

yes, all but a few get salaries from other orgs/teams. PG does a few special things:

- one address funds eth commons stewardship wholistically (~26 teams/projects, ~170 individuals)
- gives exposure to the broader ecosystem (eth/ salaries can't do this)
- funder of last resort in case of pressure from employer

In the future, it’s possible that PG flows become the primary source of income for members

probably part of it, but in my experience it's more likely that it takes _a lot_ of work to build consensus internal to the group (membership requirements, consistent eligibility frameworks) and then maintain this well over time. 

it's a daunting task that requires a committed intra-group + time + bandwidth

awesome, that’s what i figured. 

i’ve been reflecting on why we haven’t seen more PG-like experiments, and my gut says that many people are afraid to ask for money in addition to their salaries for the work that they do unless it’s undeniably a public good