keccers
@keccers.eth
Is this unique allergy treatment groundbreaking — or fraud? https://undark.org/2021/04/28/unorthodox-allergy-clinic-disrupt-medicine/ “Something rubbed me the wrong way,” Neuman said of SoCal’s secrecy. “It flies in the face of most of the things that I believe about science. You know, if someone was sitting on a cure for cancer or Alzheimer’s and wasn’t sharing it, I’d be very suspicious.” Indeed, in interviews with Undark, numerous allergists expressed concern about the SoCal clinic’s approach, yet many hesitated to go on record criticizing a method that has not been published in a reputable, peer-reviewed journal.
5 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
law
@traguy.eth
Have they been able to acquire the details of their treatment regimen and process And if not, what’s stopping them from doing that in order to properly verify what’s really going on
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
keccers
@keccers.eth
Proprietary software that dictates said regimen, essentially
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
law
@traguy.eth
Ah! Proprietary software can be a major red flag fr And I’m honestly with the allergists who are concerned about the lack of transparency here. Can you imagine if a clinic treating a life-threatening condition like cancer or Alzheimer's refused to disclose their treatment plan? It's not just about intellectual curiosity, it's about the patients’ safety If SoCal is truly confident in their approach, why not share the details with the scientific community?"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
