Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
my disappointment w/ w3 social is in its unoriginality. yes, there's so much to learn from successful w2 platforms, but it's not enough to iterate on the business model. eg: -WC = X+ -Zora = IG+ is it too much to ask for innovation in both tech and UX? the former enables new possibilities for the later
5 replies
2 recasts
19 reactions
tomu
@tomu
if we zoom in, there's innovation on how things work onchain on warpcast you own your identity on zora you earn by posting
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
I'm asking for innovation at the experience layer. There was a time when social apps created new ways for people to connect. W3 is w2 but monetized. Obviously the ownership and financial rails are part of the appeal, but the experience is otherwise a Frankensteined version of something that's already stale. I will continue to give flowers to Zora for innovating at the protocol layer
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
tomu
@tomu
yeah i get the point, just wanted to mention that what we have is big already on the feature-innovation, i agree: - we need that snapchat/tiktok feature that made all platforms to copy/pasta - we need that uber or airbnb first experience - we need something we never saw before
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steen!!!
@usersteen.eth
I agree, that the infra is big, but it's disappointing that the most funded teams are mostly retreading ground at the app layer. Most successful social apps found their path via a single behavior that was new.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
