Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Murtaza Hussain
@mazmhussain
I have some thoughts about the type of people who are best to help Farcaster grow. When it first emerged, Twitter was not trying to be a global source of news. It happened by organically when lots of people whom I'd call "news influencers" rather than journalists started using the platform for live updates, debates, and sharing information. I myself started accidentally doing reporting"while attending some anti-WTO protests and the Arab Spring as an ordinary curious observer debating people online and posting live updates. It was only after a large number of normie news junkies made Twitter a place where such conversations were happening that the stuffier and richer establishment types felt forced to join in. At that point Twitter became a "global public sphere" almost against its will. I still use Twitter and probably always will. But I think that other platforms can use the "news junkie effect" to create lively new public squares on the internet. A great city should also have more than one public square.
19 replies
5 recasts
40 reactions
Tokenized Human
@tokenizedhuman
I think it's too late, especially as the content is now being monetized. You're not going to get impartiality when the social network platform effect is already known, and even less when content has a monetary reward. There needs to be some kind of trust valuation in place to stop factual reporting turning into clickbait if farcaster really wants to go down this route to grow. I'm not convinced it's possible.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction