Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
mike rainbow (rainbow mike) ↑
@mikedemarais.eth
the new zora update means that by default mints cost $0.29 instead of the previous $2.01 price point
57 replies
15 recasts
175 reactions
Abbas🎩👾
@0xabss.eth
Most likely you can call that free now.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Sunny
@sunnysangwan
Calling them "Free" is the biggest blunder imo
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ
@toadyhawk.eth
If you think it was a blunder, you never saw what it did for creator revenue.
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Sunny
@sunnysangwan
As far as I know some made a shit load but most made not-a-lot. Am I mistaken?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ
@toadyhawk.eth
Before creator rewards and the “free mint” meta, most creators struggled to ever make money from their art. After @zora pioneered the model, I’ve seen many artists make lots of ETH in creator rewards. Psychology is a hell of a drug.
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Sunny
@sunnysangwan
I'm a big champion of artists making money but the free mint meta directly aims at their long term artistic careers in favor of short term financial reward, which is perfectly fine if that path was chosen conscientiously.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ
@toadyhawk.eth
I just don’t think that’s true. @ilustradoraeth, @priyanka, @brettdrawsstuff, @sloppy, @ccarella.eth are just a few artists off the top of my head who have have seen the power of creator rewards without sacrificing in any way their artistic integrity or reputations.
5 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
There have been artists sharing their art online since Tumblr, now there is just a way for them to get paid for it. https://zora.co/@ccarella
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Toady Hawk 🟡🎩 ᖽ
@toadyhawk.eth
And prove ownership of it.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ccarella
@ccarella.eth
actually the more important part.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
