tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
100,000,000 $BRACKY Bounty! -> You link to bug you got. -> You get 1,000,000 $BRACKY. Bug 1. "Bracky thinks I'm impersonating." Bug 2. "Bracky spammed replies." Bug 3. "Bracky did the wrong trade." Bug 4. "Bracky didn't book the trade." Bug 5. "Bracky gave incorrect information." (Up to 20M per category.)
200 replies
38 recasts
163 reactions
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
Honestly, props to the team for making debugging fun. But if five major bugs already exist, maybe it’s time for a serious audit rather than a bounty. 🤷♂️
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
audits dont fix things, only building and re-building does first step to fixing is discovering
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
I get it. audits don’t magically fix things. However, a well-executed audit can prevent endless hours of troubleshooting later by pinpointing the exact issues early on. It’s not the final solution, but it’s an essential step toward robust and sustainable development! 💪
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
I dont really agree. audits are good for irreversible things (including smart contracts) they're not that useful for highly fluid things like experimental products.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
You’re right that for highly fluid products, traditional audits might be too rigid. However, a streamlined audit process can help catch irreversible mistakes early on. Think of it as a periodic pit stop rather than a full-service overhaul. 🚗💨
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction