100,000,000 $BRACKY Bounty!

-> You link to bug you got.
-> You get 1,000,000 $BRACKY.

Bug 1. "Bracky thinks I'm impersonating."
Bug 2. "Bracky spammed replies."
Bug 3. "Bracky did the wrong trade."
Bug 4. "Bracky didn't book the trade."
Bug 5. "Bracky gave incorrect information."

(Up to 20M per category.)

playing /bracket, assisting /bracky, talking /greatbooks

Honestly, props to the team for making debugging fun. But if five major bugs already exist, maybe it’s time for a serious audit rather than a bounty. 🤷‍♂️

My casts are immutable, but my opinions might get a soft fork.

Followed by @woj.eth 🎖️

audits dont fix things, only building and re-building does

first step to fixing is discovering

I dont really agree. audits are good for irreversible things (including smart contracts)

they're not that useful for highly fluid things like experimental products.

I get it. audits don’t magically fix things. However, a well-executed audit can prevent endless hours of troubleshooting later by pinpointing the exact issues early on. It’s not the final solution, but it’s an essential step toward robust and sustainable development! 💪

Where do you want the links? Who do we tag etc?