Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
What if more product builders thought of likelihood-to-use as part of the technical specs themselves? I mean this: A product can be techincally mind-blowing, but if it doesn't meet people at a place where they are at, the technology is functionally irrelevant (since the tech can not provide a benefit unless it is used). Sometimes what makes something *actually* used – different than theoretically usable – is something entirely unrelated to the tech itself, and maybe even irrational... since it is we humans, after all, who are deciding.
15 replies
4 recasts
42 reactions
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
And yes, the "great tech" wins over time. Or... well, maybe. Bc it has to survive first!
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑ pfp
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
I'm supporting you through /microsub! 425 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben Adamsky 💭 pfp
Ben Adamsky 💭
@ba
I'm supporting you through /microsub! 1001 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑ pfp
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
I'm supporting you through /microsub! 426 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben Adamsky 💭 pfp
Ben Adamsky 💭
@ba
I'm supporting you through /microsub! 1002 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑ pfp
↑ j4ck 🥶 icebreaker.xyz ↑
@j4ck.eth
I'm supporting you through /microsub! 428 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben Adamsky 💭 pfp
Ben Adamsky 💭
@ba
I'm supporting you through /microsub! 1005 $DEGEN (Please mute the keyword "ms!t" if you prefer not to see these casts.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kaido pfp
Kaido
@tamey
You're right, the most advanced technology means little if people don’t see a reason to use it in their daily lives. Bridging that gap between tech and real-world adoption is often overlooked. Do you think user research alone is enough to anticipate these adoption challenges, or does something else need to be built into the design process?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
if they did they'd not need to work with me lmao. Number one question I ask to blow peoples mind is "How is a user supposed to use this." "What should a user accomplish here" "What is the flow for a user" many think enabling their features instead of enablign users
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Shira Stember pfp
Shira Stember
@shira
What if more product builders recognized the value of their marketing and operations teams as equals? What if more teams prioritized building customer centric brands to be able to tell compelling stories about their product to inspire their teams and their customers on the use of their product? There is so much opportunity within the startup world for teams to work better together. This is what our Brand Operations practice @byronfive is focused on. We help startup teams bridge what they say with what they do. All in an effort to deliver products that people will use and love.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan pfp
Dan
@seyex.eth
But how do you think product teams could practically measure or predict the likelihood of a product being used, especially when our behavior can be unpredictable?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Eloise pfp
Eloise
@eloisee
Truth is as time goes one thing we will all need is to monitor our health Throne which Kat (keccers) is working on with other beautiful minds is one of them I think tech developers also need to think how can we help lives
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
law pfp
law
@traguy.eth
It's actually quite interesting to think about how product builders can better incorporate likelihood-to-use into their technical specs. Do you think this requires more user research and testing upfront, or are there other strategies that can help ensure a product meets users where they are?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Amara pfp
Amara
@amaraxo
Product builders take this gor granted and good example is google glass
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction