Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A mobile client focused on photographers would do well.
44 replies
17 recasts
173 reactions
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
and then when it does well you copy features an obliterate them
5 replies
0 recast
22 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
No. Disengaging since you seem angry rn.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
I‘m just teasing how can u motivate client development when this remains an option?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
We need more quality content. We need to 100x the daily active users. Then people will be willing to build despite potential for competition.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
timdaub
@timdaub.eth
IMO there is a conflict between growth and neutrality. I agree that ur target should be 100x DAUs, but an alternative client could help achieve this goal. E.g. Ethereum grew because of third party tooling, at least in a certain understanding. Coinbase et al. made entry and exit seamless, Consensys built apps. Meanwhile EF-internal apps were uninspired (Mist browser, Whisper). Crazy idea, but maybe u could publish a public commitment to non-competition, for example, u say: „for the next 6 months we‘ll not compete with features on a photography-focused client even if it amasses more DAU than WC.“ Ofc u‘d have to be very careful as it constraints your growth potential, but I feel like if you carefully selected a few and set up a social contract this could change the dynamic. Although, I‘m not sure if it would e.g. allow someone to raise on
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I understand this pov. How isn’t Supercast fulfilling the second client requirement?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
