Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
Here's how anoncast is going to go: It's going to be fun and edgy for a while, and then people are going to realize that it makes slander free, and it will get noisy and useless and then people will unfollow it because it isn't high enough signal. It will be more meaningful to say `anon of ${KNOWN GROU} says:`
11 replies
5 recasts
68 reactions
Kartik
@slokh
@anoncast is already noisy. There's two potential solutions to that: (1) curation, right now we have a dumb method of letting large holders curate content into @anonbangers which works for now, but we need to democratize this via weighted voting (2) credentials, allow posters to attach zk credentials to their posts
4 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
tian7
@tian7.eth
btw, I shared curated anoncast at /clanker-cn . Unlike metamask if you think anoncast is not good everyone can contribute to improve it. Metamask will be dead end of the cycle. Have never met such a product which is worse and worse to use. Use rabby instead
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
