Dan Finlay 🦊 pfp
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
Here's how anoncast is going to go: It's going to be fun and edgy for a while, and then people are going to realize that it makes slander free, and it will get noisy and useless and then people will unfollow it because it isn't high enough signal. It will be more meaningful to say `anon of ${KNOWN GROU} says:`
12 replies
11 recasts
94 reactions
Dan Finlay 🦊 pfp
Dan Finlay 🦊
@danfinlay
Who could have guessed someone would use anoncast to slander me after this post. Omg my heart. Their courage. Their complete self-dox.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
ceej pfp
ceej
@ceej
on reddit people post constantly with anon usernames like HorseMop294727. eventually something will decide which anon casts are worth attention and highlight them. or maybe it will just spam out and fail but right now that's some expensive shitposting for the average crypto enjoyer.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ping pfp
Ping
@axe
Metamask is becoming increasingly difficult to use，people will stared deliting the APP
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
yes, already happened but they’re iterating to address it also it can’t be an infinite group number because then quality of content trends to average which is therefore boring would rather see an anon account run by 10-20 people, ideally influential or unique or interesting, without knowing which is casting
0 reply
0 recast
13 reactions
Kartik pfp
Kartik
@slokh
@anoncast is already noisy. There's two potential solutions to that: (1) curation, right now we have a dumb method of letting large holders curate content into @anonbangers which works for now, but we need to democratize this via weighted voting (2) credentials, allow posters to attach zk credentials to their posts
4 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
christopher pfp
christopher
@christopher
I think anonymity is strictly guaranteed but platform is not. If there are posts that are clearly not acceptable in the spirit of anonymity, it will be removed. @anoncast runs with a public goods mandate and less so a vibes one. But anyone can fork and iterate.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Honestly all the current anon accounts are already at this point. I followed them for like the days and then they went to trash
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
and🎩👾 pfp
and🎩👾
@andrewsor
anons are literally what make the internet the internet. no idea how anoncast will play out, but I'd never bet against anons.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Frosty pfp
Frosty
@frostyfruv
Dan do you have a dog ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
niftytime pfp
niftytime
@niftytime.eth
The larger the anonset the greater the anon protection tho There will be more noise but also higher chances that some truth bombs will be dropped Like a blind for truth Def think there are interesting paths that curation and negative identity development can open up that may provide a more familiar / approachable social experience for normies tho
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gabe8bit pfp
Gabe8bit
@gabe8bit
Hey man do you have a dog ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cherry666🎩 pfp
cherry666🎩
@cherry666
i am in memecoins for more than 2 years its my first time that meet a study dev like u lmao and u are one of metamask founder not wonder that most chinese donot want to use metamask now u launched tokens at base and call another sol one and telling me that about front run dont u know that pf have most snipers now?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction