Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
krel
@krel
Struggling to make sense of the vote outcome for 'fork at 10% threshold' prop. Shortcutting to my conclusion here but it seems that logically one person (or a consortium) holds an awful lot of nouns, ballpark of 300. And that person is not (primarily) motivated to arb. Other possibilities?
4 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Will Papper
@will
Almost no wallets without names voted for. Very surprised. Maybe a combination of inattention for individuals + complexities in governance participation for institutions
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
three9s
@three9s.eth
Will, what's your take on DUNA / the fork threshhold stuff? It feels like there is a minority are strongly against this, a minority shoving this through (the foundation folks), and a majority that are misinformed / aren't paying enough attention to the specifics of DUNA and thus aren't aware of the consequences.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction