A proposal to implement a dynamic rent approach to channels that would: 
* improve user experience
* limit name squatting & extortion
* increase app creators revenues

Let me know what you guys think!

A proposal to implement a dynamic rent approach to channels that would: 
* improve user experience
* limit name squatting & extortion
* increase app creators revenues

Let me know what you guys think!
https://slideframe.replit.app/QmNyAmhU3TsUJMfQfT8sAyHoYFvF7r4SALMwWN3hubc2WH

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

Writer, artist, coder, musician. Casts ideas, storytelling, blockchains, systems, art, cities. ❤️ sunsets. he/him.

Subscribe -> https://sceneswithsimon.com

co-founder at fairmint.com.
If you're a FF (Farcaster Founder) raising funds, stop right here and checkout fairmint.com. Or DC me :)

@dwr.eth , @v and team, that proposal is for you guys 👆 

@simondlr, @vitalik.eth I would be interested what you think about this application of the harberger tax given that you've very likely witnessed more experiences around it than I did 🙏

I feel like the challenge here is that channels are a public good to a greater extent than domain names. This approach works great for branded channels, where there is a single natural payer that gets a large portion of the benefit from the channel, but there's lots of other examples that don't work well.