Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/law-policy
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
TheThriller 🎩 Adam Miller
@thethriller
It’s nice how the most famous US lawyers in crypto talk about everything outside the United States as a “cottage industry” and say all the reasons to incorporate elsewhere are “nonsense”. (I know they do have a point, but have some humility and respect.)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Birdnals.eth 🎩💩
@birdnals
Tbf, they are saying U.S. projects offshoring for regulatory (non-tax) reasons but keeping operations onshore and trying to use convoluted corporate structures for regulatory arbitrage reasons are nonsense. Not that being non-U.S. based is nonsense.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sarah Shtylman
@shodyesq
From what I’ve seen, the #1 reason for a non-US structure is tax optimization. This predates the Biden admin, and is often tied to both investor preferences and regulatory (tax) clarity for projects that are global in nature.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
