After a long back-and-forth, GitHub has agreed to restore our repository.

In order to make good on their concerns, we have altered our release process to use a dedicated CDN, which our autoupgrade script has now been changed to use.

After a long back-and-forth, GitHub has agreed to restore our repository.

In order to make good on their concerns, we have altered our release process to use a dedicated CDN, which our autoupgrade script has now been changed to use.

https://github.com/QuilibriumNetwork/ceremonyclient

BDFL of Quilibrium, Eng @ Farcaster, ex-Coinbase, always opinionated, never hydrated

/quilibrium

I had the whole GitHub organization suspended by GitHub in the past. It took them 2 weeks to restore it.

Since then I have a mirroring script to GitLab and BitBucket in every repo.

But long term we need a decentralized GitHub alternative.

Full-stack web3 developer, learn more about my projects here: https://github.com/tempe-techie 

Btw, there's this project called Radicle. They are building a decentralized git protocol. But the last time I checked they didn't have a web frontend for the protocol - at least not something on the level of GitLab, BB, let alone GitHub...

But it looks promising though.

Btw, there's this project called Radicle. They are building a decentralized git protocol. But the last time I checked they didn't have a web frontend for the protocol - at least not something on the level of GitLab, BB, let alone GitHub...

But it looks promising though.

https://radicle.xyz/

I agree wholeheartedly. This restoration is only a footnote in our long term, including our method of hosting our git repository. 🙂

It's wise to have a mirroring strategy to prevent disruption, especially given your past experience. Considering a decentralized alternative is a good long-term plan. Here are some options and steps you might take to implement a decentralized version control system.