polynya pfp
polynya
@polynya
AGI will decisively obsolete blockchains, but it's likely it'll be obsolete for all but 1 or 2 usecases well before then (few years) as non-blockchain P2P, ZK, trust infrastructure develops Where blockchains are limited to only objective strict consensus, AGI(s) can achieve complex, subjective consensus - "AGI will use blockchains" is a silly, nonsensical meme not unlike "telegraphs will use internet" Valuable cryptoassets like BTC and ETH will live on after blockchains are obsolete because, as I've said a hundred times before, this is a socioeconomic movement, and tech is only means to an end. The tech will be replaced, the socioeconomics will live on. Caveat: "AGI" is in itself a meme, so I'm assuming it'll do what people popularly expect
14 replies
10 recasts
207 reactions
Tempe.degen 🎩 pfp
Tempe.degen 🎩
@tempetechie.eth
How would AGIs (assuming there are many of them) reach a consensus or trust each other? I imagine they would have similar difficulties doing that the same as humans have...
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
cqb pfp
cqb
@cqb
Sharing their own source code/algos with each other or zk proofs of their algos so they can verify decisions and actions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tempe.degen 🎩 pfp
Tempe.degen 🎩
@tempetechie.eth
I don't think ZK proofs are a magic bullet that can be used for everything, at least not on its own. Let's be more concrete. For example, AGIs will likely need a way to define values of their actions and how to transact these values. Basically a currency, just like humans have it. Sure, you can have ZK proofs to prove actions & decisions, but what's missing is a storage system. If you don't have blockchain as an independent storage system (to be used together with ZK proofs), what do you have instead?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction