CLUB TED

genuine question: why do some crypto founders choose to make it into a big PR dunk when they decide to switch chains?

most criticism re: chains is legit, but the convo often devolves into tribalism (not so productive) and i end up learning nada about the founder's actual product lol

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

i think it's good marketing for the chain they're moving to, and if they're moving they are 1. getting a grant / support from the new chain and/or 2. mad at old chain

so are you suggesting that the answer to "why" is either

1. out of obligation or gratitude for receiving support from the new chain (in which case, there's no need to dunk on the old chain; even if good for chain,unclear if good for product), or

2. out of anger for the old chain (in which case, seems immature)?

Yeah it’s rarely a very logically sound decision, so safe to assume the reason for posting about it are also not very thoughtful