Farcaster

why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? 

it could:
1. amplify reach (shared audiences)  
2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort)
3. build deeper connections  

maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

feels like this is a groupchat. 

3-5 people in one groupchat works best as UI.

You aren't guaranteed to see the messages in an algo feed and going to channel is extra effort vs opening the groupchat in your usual message app

instead of person A, B + C casting about topic Y in their own siloes (which happens), it’d be better — for them and for the network — if A, B, C casted in one place and engaged w/ each other.

Bluesky, TikTok algo etc. make it easy to discover discussions on specific topics. hard here, so topics don’t grow.

respectfully not a group chat; group chats aren’t intended to be discovered nor grown.

Farcaster Product Studio @ https://dTech.vision 💜 in love with tech 🤓decentralization, fitness and oldschool rap 😎

respectfully not a group chat; group chats aren’t intended to be discovered nor grown.

https://warpcast.com/ted/0x4368b930

less about conversation, more about topic awareness.

3 - 5 people casting about same topic in one place is to seed and amplify the topic so that more people can see it and cast about it

right now, not enough topic-specifics content to a) train algos to always surface it nor b) encourage more of the topic’s content

I am talking user interface wise

Messaging app UI -> I don’t miss anyone sharing something and can get to it easily

Channels -> I miss it and more friction to the conversation 