Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
phil
@phil
Farcaster's open and permissionless data model is great while we're still a small, high-trust community. But it's fundamentally at odds with privacy. I'm not sure we've fully internalized the consequences of having a permanent history of our speech tied to our financial records.
21 replies
9 recasts
156 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
valid point and one that i consider often, however farcaster offchain data isn't permanent and i'm afraid this reads as it is users have to pay storage per year and if you don't pay then the data is pruned
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
phil
@phil
I guarantee you someone is already archiving every cast Storage is so cheap and getting cheaper When you delete a cast you have no guarantee that it is actually gone
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
true of everything on the internet, even encrypted data can be screenshotted
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
phil
@phil
Yes, but there is an assumption that p2p data or private stuff on corporate networks isn’t continuously being crawled and archived at the same scale This is fundamentally a design tradeoff We will adapt but it will be messy
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
