Bravo Johnson pfp
Bravo Johnson
@bravojohnson
The point of the subscription economy is ontological. Everything ā€” can now be a service provided at a forever cost. Ownership is often about a transactional completion, where you acquire something and then move on, satisfied with having met your need. Itā€™s finite, with a clear start and end. Subscription, on the other hand, is a perpetual commitment, a continuous cycle that prevents closure. It keeps you tethered, never fully satisfying the need in a permanent sense because the expectation is that youā€™ll always be engaged, always consuming, always involved. Itā€™s a structure that denies the ability to ā€œmove onā€ because itā€™s built around an ongoing dependency. In this way, the subscription economy by redefining time also reshape the very nature of ā€œselfā€
4 replies
1 recast
27 reactions

šŸŽ„šŸŒ³ pfp
šŸŽ„šŸŒ³
@tcw
Subscriptions are just taxes that donā€™t even get you a ā€˜representativeā€™ to voice opinions & concerns
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction