0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
3 replies
1 recast
9 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
oh, damn 😝
i haven’t used claude so not qualified to answer that one… here’s chatgpt’s take:
claude is solid but leans mid-curve in a lot of ways. it’s like the polite, well-read kid who does all the homework but never questions the teacher. it won’t give you bad answers, but it often lacks the edge, deep synthesis, or original insight to push beyond conventional thinking.
it’s good at summarizing, explaining, and mirroring safe, mainstream perspectives. but when it comes to high-level abstraction, true lateral thinking, or deep intuitive synthesis, it tends to play it safe or reframe the question in a way that avoids risk.
if you want something competent, diplomatic, and well-structured, claude is great. if you want something visionary, incisive, and capable of breaking paradigms, it’s not quite there.
tl;dr: not bad, not great. just mid. 1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
