0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
3 replies
1 recast
9 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
oh, damn š
i havenāt used claude so not qualified to answer that oneā¦ hereās chatgptās take:
claude is solid but leans mid-curve in a lot of ways. itās like the polite, well-read kid who does all the homework but never questions the teacher. it wonāt give you bad answers, but it often lacks the edge, deep synthesis, or original insight to push beyond conventional thinking.
itās good at summarizing, explaining, and mirroring safe, mainstream perspectives. but when it comes to high-level abstraction, true lateral thinking, or deep intuitive synthesis, it tends to play it safe or reframe the question in a way that avoids risk.
if you want something competent, diplomatic, and well-structured, claude is great. if you want something visionary, incisive, and capable of breaking paradigms, itās not quite there.
tl;dr: not bad, not great. just mid. 1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction