0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
4 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
![bloke pfp](https://imagedelivery.net/BXluQx4ige9GuW0Ia56BHw/720a8e80-4d6f-46bc-34cb-45d644e9a600/rectcrop3)
Nowadays, when I think about using something, I no longer think solely about what they offer, but how they arrived at those implementations. And, the 'how' is driven by the 'ideology' layer-the core beliefs that shape every decision.
Ex. Consider a social media DAO whose priorities/policies are as follows:
- Decentralization: Proposals are decided upon by direct democracy; DAO only deals with businesses that meet X/Y standards
- Privacy: full encryption, zero-knowledge proofs for transactions, no metadata tracking
- Monetization: fixed transaction fee (X%), redistributed to community nodes.
- Transparency: open-source code, transparent moderation policies, auditable AI algorithms
I imagine the DAO would use these policies internally, as reasons tied to proposals, to make decisions.
Using a system like this, we can compare differentials between the users' beliefs, other DAOs, and what the DAO itself actually enacts.
--And I can finally figure out which social media platform I actually want to use... 1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction