ted (not lasso)
@ted
resisted being *that* person but woke up and chose violence: FC is so male coded that a) it can get tired, and b) i still spend significant time on insta + twitter for chick stuff instead of FC yes, the men here are infinitely better than the men on twitter BUT the dynamic will remain a challenge. /chicks channel plz
32 replies
7 recasts
86 reactions
sean
@swabbie.eth
How much of this problem is due to the audience and how much is due to the content type? I know both are interrelated, so hard to answer, but I’m wondering if platform limitations might also be a hurdle?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
what do you mean by platform limitations? like lack of video support or what? even for myself, it is hard to discover other women on FC in its current form and then even harder to engage with their content outside of the popular female accounts i know and love.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sean
@swabbie.eth
to use instagram as an example, the content type seems to be what initially drew the audience - e.g. posts with a carousel of high quality images, and text minimized / hidden. while images are possible on FC, the twitteresque feature focus seems to mostly attract former twitter users, 2/3 of whom are typically male.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sean
@swabbie.eth
tl;dr: I'm hypothesizing that content precedes audience, but perhaps that is an incorrect assumption.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
