whoa
https://twitter.com/DefiIgnas/status/1680921857271398400

I still need to dive into exactly what is technically happening, but if you need to keep abstracting away the crypto layers of your app I don’t think I understand the point of you building it onchain?

Or at least the way you’re putting it onchain?

Feels like an architecture redesign makes more sense but idk

/cameron for content experiments. I help Creators grow faster @ seemore.tv + /seemore. Posts at creator3x3.com.
Dev + Veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

I agree. To be fair to them, it sounds kinda like FC hubs, so they aren’t alone. 

In either case, I don’t think the non-blockchain networks will last long term anyway, because the economics will eventually force them to centralize, federate, or go to blockchains with built in hosting compensation mechanisms

But no one can beat the FC community. Our network might change over time, but the people here will change the industry.

I wasn’t referring to Warpcast.

Someone pays to host FC hubs. Unlike a blockchain, hubs doesn’t have a built in hosting compensation mechanism, so it will need to be externally managed when not subsidized

They also don’t offer the composability of turing complete blockchains, which limits organic feature growth

Very different design than Hubs.

If the corporate funding for Lens stops, network shuts down tomorrow. 

Apps integrated with Hubs work today if Warpcast goes down. Happened a week or so ago.

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

Yea 100%

I’m here because my conviction around organizing protocols requires the approach @dwr.eth and @v are taking with sufficient decentralization shifting over time. 

I just think it’s disingenuous when folks disagree with their words and then agree with their actions little by little lol