Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
krel
@krel
Thinking of ways to visualize our assets and spend rate (at a glance) on Camp but not sure if this framing helps or hurts. Grateful for any feedback or suggestions.
11 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
krel
@krel
I suggest it helps bc: - Understanding spend rate is part of the bigger picture when evaluating proposals - The goal of reaching sustainable spend rates (we dont spend more than we make on eg a yearly basis) is healthy for nouns longterm And it might hurt bc: - Framing spend like this might emphasize restrictiveness and being overly protective of the treasury. My tldr stance here is that i believe managing spend is useful but halting spend is bad -- the treasury is meant to be used and nouns as a project wont move fwd w/o the critical function of redeploying auction revenue.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
supriyo
@supriyo.eth
this looks good as is. I think nouns has done more than decent job spending its treasury. Having no restrictive stance is probably contributing to outflow accelerating while inflows trend downward. I don’t think the nouns mission is to only deploy its treasury, as an infinite IP project it needs longevity to see it through. IP seeding takes time and Nouns should weather it come out on the other side.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions