supriyo on Warpcast

Content pfp

https://opensea.io/collection/nouns

0 reply

1 recast

1 reaction

supriyo pfp

Thanks for pointing it out @bixbite a) Nouns movie funding isnt commingled with Quack and Lola. Completely Different teams and pipelines have been executing on it. b) Quack and Lola were given a one-time grant of roughly 100k via Prop 486 (36 weth at the time). c) Quack and Lola have over 7 figs now in merch revenue (brand partnership revenue additional) and we have now given out over 1000+ units of our best selling merchandises to various nouns funded initiatives free of cost including covering shipping. If you are trying to build a commercial for-profit intiative on top of nouns primitive and can’t find any traction, its likely an issue with your approach and not fault of nouns goverance. 🫡

5 replies

10 recasts

42 reactions

Pierre ⌐◨-◨ pfp

Pierre ⌐◨-◨

@pierre-coetzee

I can respect this reply, and fully agreed. Including myself a lot of creatives are struggling to find PMF. I think what most of us builders are wondering (that are situated below this type of project funding & reach): how can we tap into the vast digital mindshare you've built? And the simplest answer is helping us to promote Nouns.World and Flows.wtf through a cool story animation in some shape or form. This atleast gets new eyeballs on great functioning social sites that are there to benefit everyone? Should that be a thing? It worries me that we've all been here for 3 or more years and no one is talking about large scale co-branding.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

87Bones pfp

https://media.tenor.com/Jf9JQpRb4PsAAAAC/hell-yeah-thats-what-im-talking-about

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨ pfp

Benjamin ⌐◨-◨

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

wylin pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

frankie.base.eth pfp

frankie.base.eth

The issue isn’t how to approach nouns, it’s about the current structure where people trade favors, benefiting a small circle instead of the broader ecosystem. This place is a walled garden, and out of the 150+ active members, a good percentage are trapped in this cycle, holding back progress. The DAO and governance are much different now than when you raised, and thankfully, you proved to be an executor (which is wild considering people still talk negative about Quack to this day) + Actual executors are rare now. Where’s the proof of execution? What’s working across these props, and where’s the accountability for actual results? Some prefer nouns because they benefit them, not the broader community. The real issue is sparse governance that can’t effectively evaluate or support new opportunities—and that’s by design. I’m hopeful the new nouns era changes things, but it sounds like you’re referencing a time that no longer exists.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction