Poetry

if a poem has no rhyme and no structure is it still a poem (why/why not)?

Curating human insight | Follow @survey for polls | Visit weponder.io for more | By @ba and @cojo.eth

Bringing literature to a blockchain near you. Writer, storyteller and poet followed by over 1 million.

A teller / of stories, that is me. / Curious to learn new ways to see. / Proud dad of two. Now, what / about you? | Builds https://paragraph.xyz/@trpplffct

Thank you for the degen!!

I certainly agree - intention is everything. I also believe that anything can be a poem because poems have an internal logic of their own - they define what they are.

Good one for a @ponder question.

Anyway, I'd say sure. Id it's intended or received as a poem, who are we to argue.

BTW, loving the question, David.

270 $degen

marketing @ Outlier | ex-founder 💎 require (message.value = 42)🪐 strange words, stranger dreams 👽 lives in a 🍄

Many good points raised here - reminds me a bit of that old story of Picasso, learning all the “rules” of painting and form before he eventually broke them all

Yes but imo it’s probably a bad one. You should know the rules before you can break the rules. Despite the poem being unrhymed and unstructured I’d say that someone who  understands the rhetorical devices of poetry but chooses not to use the most basic ones they will still use something - rhythm, onomatopoeia, chiasmus, metonymy etc. Poems are like songs - the good ones stick in your head and you don’t know why until you understand what makes them work. They shouldn’t be just a jumble of words.