Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

David Jones pfp
David Jones
@storydj
if a poem has no rhyme and no structure is it still a poem (why/why not)?
3 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

eunika🍒 pfp
eunika🍒
@eunika.eth
Yes but imo it’s probably a bad one. You should know the rules before you can break the rules. Despite the poem being unrhymed and unstructured I’d say that someone who understands the rhetorical devices of poetry but chooses not to use the most basic ones they will still use something - rhythm, onomatopoeia, chiasmus, metonymy etc. Poems are like songs - the good ones stick in your head and you don’t know why until you understand what makes them work. They shouldn’t be just a jumble of words.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

trpplffct  pfp
trpplffct
@trpplffct
I agree with the yes, and sure, I think poets can benefit frim understanding the tools at their disposal. However, I don't believe in a universal standard of what is good or bad poetry. 27 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

David Jones pfp
David Jones
@storydj
Many good points raised here - reminds me a bit of that old story of Picasso, learning all the “rules” of painting and form before he eventually broke them all
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction