politics

I'm confused by those who believe the DNC will support crypto. Where's the flaw in the below thinking?

Assumption 1: Democrats and the US state have merged into one group.
Assumption 2: Crypto explicitly challenges the dollar, the power core of this group.

Conclusion: Since crypto threatens the Dems' global power, they will be the last to accept it—just like the Catholic Church resisted the printing press until defeat was inevitable.

Open-mic comic who reads too much about network states. Find my clips on seemore.tv/stevlesh

Senior Philosopher of /cryptoart-school  /stellabelle and /khive 🍭 Gigatura  👉🏽 https://objkt.com/curations/objkt/gigatura-launch:-auctions-c31a0063

Totally cool with people valuing things other than crypto. If something else matters more to you, that's great - vote for that thing. 

I just dont think we should expect the democrat party to change their stance on crypto. That's the part that seems illogical to me.

I also don’t think it’s true Trump wants to remove women’s rights. He has said multiple time that he has no interest in a national abortion ban and that he just wants to leave abortion laws to the states, which seems like a reasonable course of action for any divisive issues. Nevertheless, you don’t have to make crypto your #1 value.

the reality is: women won’t vote for a rapist. Also women like me who are aware of their intentions to remove our rights completely: our bags are just not a priority over our freedoms. If we are enslaved none of this shit matters, this is what cryptobros don’t understand

There’s a revolving door between government agencies and Democratic Party power centers, like big tech, mainstream media, and universities. Recent examples include the head of the NSA moving to OpenAI and Jen Psaki getting her own show on MSNBC.

Before 2016 and Trump, the USA was basically a one-party system, with Ds and Rs agreeing on the key issues -- defense, trade, and immigration. Trump diverged from these positions, and many Bush-Cheney Republicans (ie the Rs from the one-party world) defected to the Democrat Party. Eg Frum and Wehner write for the Atlantic now.

"Democrats and the US state have merged into one group"

how?

growth @teller coming soon @clarity





























































hosting /kieran /usdc /loans 

Their true policy stance is endless foreign wars and infinite money printing. Everything else is just a noise.

The DNC is going to destroy humanity, crypto isn’t even relevant if they stay in power.

🥑🍋 Farmer / LAMP stack dev / Husband / 🌈 Dad / Web1 dude loving a web3 world / Collector of things digital & physical / 
CdeP ‘94 

Global crypto adoption seems inevitable, but bipartisan support doesn't. The dollar's status as world reserve currency is a major source of DC's power, benefiting coastal elites/Dems at the expense of manufacturing/MAGA. Since crypto is global, state-free money, embracing it also means relinquishing all that power. Why would they?

Crypto support under both parties is inevitable.  The devil will be in the details. The ETF approvals are the final straw.  There’s too much institutional money invested to go back

> Democrats and the US state have merged into one group.

i dont have a take on what the DNC will or will not do but its not clear why this assumption is true to me

Not suppressing it is essentially the same as supporting it at this point since it requires passing laws to undo the current suppression.

We don’t need them to support it, we need them to not suppress it

Here for the freedom tech.         
Building at acre.fi. 
                      Contributing at threshold.network. 


I agree we're on an accelarated timeline which I'm hoping means we get to live through the next renaissance 🙃

Great comparison. Maybe we’re on an accelerated timeline where the capitulation to the printing press is nigh?