Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/frames
0 reply
4 recasts
4 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
Frames are good for what they are: interactive link previews imo being able to launch a mini app from a frame completes the spectrum of fidelity i.e. Link preview -> interactive link preview -> mini app -> full standalone app
15 replies
1 recast
27 reactions

Hoot šŸŽ© pfp
Hoot šŸŽ©
@owl
Just copy what telegram is doing with Miniapps and we're good!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

0xbhaisaab pfp
0xbhaisaab
@0xbhaisaab
100%, could not agree more to this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
100%
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Hang Yin pfp
Hang Yin
@h4x3rotab
No.... Frontend developers be like:
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

0xpagicerah pfp
0xpagicerah
@pagicerah
Logical progression, seamless user experience 20 $WILD
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pain pfp
Pain
@painx
Really love the idea of frames on this app tbh.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

binocularsXLšŸš€ pfp
binocularsXLšŸš€
@binocularsx
You should check out nook.social to browse media, it gives a frame, has an action, gives a link preview and mobile app is coming up on TestFlight soon.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Just Build pfp
Just Build
@justbuild
Really like how this evolved into apps in the feed. Much better UX to keep everything contained in WC instead of sending people off to a browser like all of the original designs did. When people return, they're going to be pleasantly surprised how they have evolved, along with cast actions. Bullish.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jai pfp
Jai
@jaivsdawrld
Frames really switched up the game canā€™t lie and i think it will soon be adopted by major companies
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction