Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
i have a server that receives webhooks from telegram - i want to forward these requests to a 3rd party app in a way that they can independently verify the integrity of the data and respond to me with a message what's the best way of doing this with low latency?
8 replies
5 recasts
43 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
cc @eulerlagrange.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
saw a similar question on the tls notary discord asked a follow up related to telegram webhooks since they allow self-signed certificates 🀞
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eric siu 🐈 pfp
eric siu 🐈
@randomishwalk
@pse + @chiali
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
welcome to telegram world where json they send in the webhooks is unsigned and unencrypted telegrameans plain text
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gitaalekhyapaul.eth | .polygon pfp
gitaalekhyapaul.eth | .polygon
@gitaalekhyapaul
You can generate a key pair for each client 3rd party app and then use that to create a digest of the webhook data and send it to the 3rd party clients. Then the clients can verify the digital signature using the API key.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben Adamsky πŸ’­ pfp
Ben Adamsky πŸ’­
@ba
@warpcastadmin.eth maybe in your realm?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

nx pfp
nx
@nxs
Web Sockets? Though the app should actively wait for these requests. I don’t think it’s possible if the app is not already opened.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Hendrik pfp
Hendrik
@heeckhau
@TLSNotary was made for this: the third party can run the verifier so they don’t need to trust you or anybody else. It does have a bandwidth and latency cost. If latency is more important than trustlessness, there might be other solutions (e.g., TLS-proxy) that add less latency.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction