Stephan
@stephancill
p2p social
4 replies
2 recasts
13 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
remove the extractive middlemen
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Mike | Abundance ๐
@abundance
how? ๐ ๐
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
Completely rethink the stack - p2p content hosting - client side feed building - maybe onchain profiles/social graph for composability
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
MOฮ
@moe
That does sound nice. Itโs kind of what Lens is: - onchain social graph - content on ipfs/arweave - no central feed algo But itโs a ghost town
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
it's never about the tech really. the people are what makes the network valuable. with that being said, the tech is important for solving problems basically everything you mentioned is true about farcaster as well (if you take onchain โ onhub). a lot hinges on the standard set by the flagship client what i want to see is a fat client that handles feed ordering, content discovery, and serving/relaying content so that there doesn't have to be a middleman that needs to extract from users to pay its bills
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
MOฮ
@moe
Yeah agreed. Both are important. I was initially attracted to Lens more than farcaster for the reasons mentioned above. But the tech doesnโt matter if there are no users and no good execution strategy. But there will always be a middleman. In your scenario that client IS the middleman, and will need to make money somehow from its users, no?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
