Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
Discuss https://x.com/jacobandreou/status/1832665444651880628
25 replies
7 recasts
34 reactions
Stephan
@stephancill
Imo he’s right that users don’t want to choose their algo That doesn’t mean the user’s ability to choose isn’t extremely important
6 replies
0 recast
26 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Choose an app not an algo
3 replies
2 recasts
9 reactions
Vanessa Williams
@fridgebuzz.eth
How about choosing an app that lets you choose an algo? Bluesky promised such a thing in the AT architecture but it never came to be. User-owned storage was the other possibly interesting thing. No more paying for each “like”. A fusion of FC and AT could be interesting territory.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
i know that warpcast does a lot of work to make their feeds performant at scale, which i would imagine would be hard to do with third party algorithms i love the idea of user owned storage - it's my favourite part of bluesky's architecture
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Vanessa Williams
@fridgebuzz.eth
Performance is a good point, but even so there should be some choice. Not just whatever non-transparent, constantly changing algo is chosen by devs. WC is getting dangerously close to X wrt to showing you what they want to show you not what you want to see, and displaying casts differently depending on the supposedly non-existent PB. I think even file sizes have been nerfed for the plebes. And there isn’t a large enough variety of clients to make “use another client” practical. You’ll just be subject to some other dev’s whims.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
