Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
The biggest problem I have with passkeys in crypto is that it fails the walkaway test because it’s tied to a domain Is this solvable?
7 replies
3 recasts
53 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Smart contract with multiple passkeys
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

payton ↑ pfp
payton ↑
@payton
There are some initiatives to make this more malleable. See the new related origins request feature on Chrome: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/passkeys-updates-chrome-129?hl=en#related-origin-requests
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

zenxosa◼️Ⓜ️🎩  pfp
zenxosa◼️Ⓜ️🎩
@zenxosa
You could be develop passkeys tied to your crypto wallet addresses instead of a domain.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tony D’Addeo  pfp
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
see Farcaster split custody address / signing keys design with signer request flow :)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jorge Pablo Franetovic 🎩 pfp
Jorge Pablo Franetovic 🎩
@jpfraneto.eth
im sure @cassie has a good answer to this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sinaver pfp
Sinaver
@sinaver.eth
never considered passkeys as the 1st class citizen authorisation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

 Lukaa pfp
Lukaa
@lukaa
can you try to integrate passkeys with hardware wallets or key management systems that aren't domain dependent?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction