Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Stephan
@stephancill
@v mentioned engagement score for rewards is normalised by active users Seeing as warpcast already has this data, active followers might be more useful to show on profiles than raw followers imo
6 replies
2 recasts
33 reactions
Sangohan.base.eth π
@sangohan
In that case, maybe a simple mention like "xxxx active followers this week/month" would do the trick? Because in my opinion, if someone subscribed and showed interest even once, regardless of their activity, it's still an engagement that deserves to be acknowledged permanently.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
RAJ_108X
@raj108x.eth
Interesting point! Do you think focusing on active followers could shift the way people approach building their online presence?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Giwa π©
@0xgiwa.eth
What are the criteria for being an active followers, is it followers who haven't casted for some weeks/months or followers who have been marked as spam/bots? Just curious to know
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
downshift
@downshift.eth
π― would also be very cool if we could auto-unfollow folks over a certain threshold of inactivity (although farcasterstudio.com does a great job of this already...@fun, could we have it run automatically on a schedule?)
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Miguelgarest
@miguelgarest.eth
Ohh that sounds pretty interesting, would love to see that especially on those 400k followers accounts
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
π _π£π _π
@m-j-r
in addition to being a massive flex against vote-hiding platforms like reddit & X (which are botted to hell), I think this is one of the most competitive edges in the entire socialfi arena (including dark horses like nostr).
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
