Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
this OpEd reads as intellectually dishonest. 2 Qs: 1 why is it fine for women to be single-issue voters on abortion but not for others to be on crypto? 2 how is it fine to twist the pro-crypto stance from “supporting economic freedom” to “selfish financial interests”? answer seems to be in the last paragraph
20 replies
23 recasts
136 reactions
links 🏴
@links
1. Politically-involved people think single-issue voters are naive. There’s no greater sin for any party faithful. 2. The age of impartial journalism is over. We live in a post-truth society. Authors can and will mix any opinion they like to support their thesis. It’s not fine, it’s just how it is rn.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
iSpeakNerd 🧙♂️
@ispeaknerd.eth
@spenser was telling me about a public goods information idea yesterday, looking forward to that launch down the road
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
spenser🪳
@spenser
👀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
