this OpEd reads as intellectually dishonest. 2 Qs:

1 why is it fine for women to be single-issue voters on abortion but not for others to be on crypto?

2 how is it fine to twist the pro-crypto stance from “supporting economic freedom” to “selfish financial interests”?

answer seems to be in the last paragraph

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

1. Politically-involved people think single-issue voters are naive. There’s no greater sin for any party faithful.

2. The age of impartial journalism is over.  We live in a post-truth society.  Authors can and will mix any opinion they like to support their thesis.

It’s not fine, it’s just how it is rn.

Building @swaye - swaye.co | Ex Managing Director @CoinList, Research @Messari | 🇹🇼🇺🇸

Startup artist seeking inspiration.  Champion of /bcard

@spenser was telling me about a public goods information idea yesterday, looking forward to that launch down the road