Snow551 pfp

Snow551

@snow551

8 Following
0 Followers


Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
@drakefjustin's work is incredibly valuable to ethereum's future, especially those of us who care about keeping the protocol decentralized and secure long-term and fighting against the zoo of technical bloat. The beam chain roadmap got criticism for the "2029" date, but what that criticism misses is that the beam chain roadmap is a completely separate and parallel workstream from the work that is happening already to meet users' needs in the short term (basically, scaling blobs, where @dankrad has for years played a leading and invaluable part) In 2025, we need blobs (and L1 cost reductions like EIP-4444). In 2026, we need more blobs. @fradamt @dankrad and many others are heroes for pushing forward the research here. By 2030, we need other things: * Long-term robust economics * Long-term robust staking decentralization * A clean and simple protocol, something worthy of a chain that aspires to be a neutral global base layer. This means zeroing out huge amounts of technical bloat ...
15 replies
43 recasts
300 reactions

Snow551 pfp
Snow551
@snow551
Hi
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
More tokens should have a 1st-party frame Moxie pioneered this with v1 and DCs, but I think Frames v2 offer a powerful way for tokens to convert holders into DAU. 1. Reward users for installing and opening your frame 1x a day 2. Send notifications daily to remind people 3. When they open the frame, surface important announcements 4. A large user base opening up a frame every day offers opportunities for partnerships and additional monetization (e.g. ads, offers, other airdrops) Compare: "We have 1,000,000 unique addresses holding our token" "We have 1,000,000 DAU users"
15 replies
34 recasts
177 reactions

chuckstock pfp
chuckstock
@chuckstock
does anyone else have a prejudice against certain shapes in geo crush? because stars infuriate me. i feel like they always want me to lose. they just never spawn when i need them
29 replies
7 recasts
49 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
It's interesting how AI is changing the game on old concerns around legalese.
32 replies
124 recasts
608 reactions

Snow551 pfp
Snow551
@snow551
Gôid day
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Snow551 pfp
Snow551
@snow551
Check your degen stats. Frame v2 by @compez.eth From Effort to Achievement – $GENY Helps You Share Your Path! 🌟
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

chuckstock pfp
chuckstock
@chuckstock
so far behind on all these challenges, but im about to start cleaning up on some newbs
5 replies
1 recast
49 reactions

Snow551 pfp
Snow551
@snow551
Hello
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
One meta belief I have, is that I think "on the face pursuing idealistic objective A, but actually being tilted toward selfish objective B" is better than "openly pursuing objective B". Many seem to believe the opposite, typically saying something like "at least the latter is honest". I feel like what this misses, is that maintaining the face of pursuing idealistic objective A, and using A to coordinate a large coalition, is a pretty big speed bump against attempts to pursue B too brazenly. When "the mask comes off", things actually become much worse, and strategies that pursue B at high costs to other values (including A, and also often general human decency) become unlocked. Are there any good arguments against this intuition I have? (Whether generalized, or about specific situations)
60 replies
106 recasts
588 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Anyone else starting to get worried about this rise of casual open imperialism? Like, not "peaceful trade at prices social justice activists don't like" imperialism but actual "let's go conquer stuff" imperialism. I know it's "meant to be a joke", but often such jokes are a first step to normalizing something dark...
60 replies
64 recasts
384 reactions