horsefacts 🚂
@horsefacts.eth
I expect @anoncast will approach the same end state as channel moderation. Even with good tools, nobody wants to sort through a pile of unfiltered garbage to pick out the good stuff, especially when you can just use the distribution to pump your own bags instead. The problem is harder without identity.
10 replies
2 recasts
64 reactions
Kartik
@slokh
Theory was people would be incentivized to moderate based on holdings, assuming price action correlates with the account's content/engagement. To be seen if true, might not work (as seen with token shilling going on right now)
4 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
Kartik
@slokh
Well as I said this, someone(s) seemingly have started cleaning up @anoncast of the token shilling
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
could you have reputation with zk identity? if your anoncasts get axed too often, your next one won’t even post.
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
nuconomy.⌐◨-◨
@nuconomy.eth
I’ve been watching both feeds and would help moderate but it’s a long way between 20k tokens and 2 million. I wonder how many of the 2M accounts have actually made a promotion/delete action. It feels like a very small percentage.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
sam
@saliba.eth
Need a group that only deleters/promoters can join and need to disseminate regular information on best practices regarding moderation and twitter content policy guidelines. Everyone who has the power to moderate should be educated on what things are encouraged and help the ANON brand and what things might result in getting suspended or banned from Twitter.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
