please criticize the superchain as hard as you can publicly under this post please

i hope to either dispel things or learn something new — opinions are my own

& don’t hold back

lore @optimism | ex: @coinbase | views are my own | what if it all worked out? 

I think the new RPGF category delineation is a bit weird, with lots of overlap between the categories and lack of clarity as to what qualifies in the Onchain Builders category

I also think the role of the OP token is quite murky as the Foundation seems to be executing governance

I would maybe think about it as "layers of the stack", which current schema gets close to (though obv yall have thought way more deeply about this than me)

Core infra/OP stack development --> Dev tooling --> Protocols/apps that end users touch --> Media/Content

good feedback imo, it’s an educational gap and a communication thing bur amazing minds are working on this 

How would you structure it differently if you could? 

@jonassft @mxw @vonnie610 @

Plus one to the first part!

I wish there was more info on what defines an “onchain builder”

I feel a lot of creators could potentially submit to this round but there are a few barriers

The main one being lack of clarity but also - if someone wants to “claim an idea”

Even that is technical to set up w GitHub