Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

binji 🔴 pfp
binji 🔴
@binji.eth
please criticize the superchain as hard as you can publicly under this post please i hope to either dispel things or learn something new — opinions are my own & don’t hold back
16 replies
0 recast
15 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
I think the new RPGF category delineation is a bit weird, with lots of overlap between the categories and lack of clarity as to what qualifies in the Onchain Builders category I also think the role of the OP token is quite murky as the Foundation seems to be executing governance
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

binji 🔴 pfp
binji 🔴
@binji.eth
good feedback imo, it’s an educational gap and a communication thing bur amazing minds are working on this How would you structure it differently if you could? @jonassft @mxw @vonnie610 @
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
I would maybe think about it as "layers of the stack", which current schema gets close to (though obv yall have thought way more deeply about this than me) Core infra/OP stack development --> Dev tooling --> Protocols/apps that end users touch --> Media/Content
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction