six
@six
I don’t think the data on clanker vs pdf is right from my understanding it’s comparing all clanker volume, to just pdf bonding curve volume clanker has been a resounding success but that metric feels misleading unless I’m just totally wrong? which would be ideal
6 replies
11 recasts
57 reactions
six
@six
@proxystudio.eth
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
I've been pretty open about this issue, the difficult of comparing launchpads with a bonding curve to one that launches directly onto markets clanker has no "secondary" its all just clanker volume pump, wow, ape store all define their volume as happening on bonding curve
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
goal is certainly not to be misleading about to scale of clanker volume, just to benchmark our growth against competitors
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
six
@six
yes def not suggesting you are intentionally trying to mislead, aware the models are pretty different making it hard to compare
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
I think part of this is that I'm approaching it in relation to revenue & fees, as we've been deep in that data clanker did 60m of volume, thats the number that matters for our revenue & for our users fee share pump did 405m of volume on the bonding curve (where they earn revenue, charge fees)
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
six
@six
I think this is fair reasoning
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
we're biased towards more data, so we'll continue to refine & improve these metrics, I also think its relevant - particularly with base competitors whats the total vol of all graduated coins from wow, ape, etc @tian7.eth useful feedback here
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
six
@six
I’ve always felt fees are the best metric because they measure aggregate market demand for your protocol/blockspace when comparing chains, protocols etc
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
totally - so many of the metrics builders and founders rely on for benchmarks or just to track usage are a bit wishy washy, fees express tangible costs, rewards, demand over time
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction