Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
two things can be true: 1. this is good revenue generation for these pods that wouldn’t have been generated on traditional platforms 2. as a podcaster, “minutes listened” is infinitely more valuable to me compared to “mints,” which imo is the most unreliable onchain metric for quality of multimedia content
19 replies
7 recasts
251 reactions
Dan Simmons
@simmons
re "infinitely more valuable": how are you defining "value" in this context? I'd argue that mints are a much stronger signal vs downloads: one is free, and the other has you opening your wallet to support the creator. tbh, I listen to about 10% of what my podcatcher auto-downloads due to lack of time
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i'm not comparing mints vs. downloads; i'm comparing minutes listened (actual consumption) vs. mints (intent to consume). also majority of podcast mints - especially those that use layer3 or boosts - are people "downloading/minting" with the expectation that they will get paid (airdropped) in return for paying
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction