Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
The practice of bridging between protocols today is absurd. The user friction is comparably frustrating to getting booted from the internet in 1997 when my home phone rang. Something has to change for mainstream adoption to occur. Who here is going to fix this?
20 replies
5 recasts
36 reactions
Sheldon Trotman
@sheldon
🙋🏾♂️ with @sugarcane you don’t have to think about bridges, chains nor gas.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
Even at the wallet level? I don't have to think about what chain my tokens are on?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sheldon Trotman
@sheldon
Yup. Sign up with an email and the system deploys self custody smart contract wallets on all the chains and whenever you want to take an action the system dynamically constructs the transaction to swap/bridge your assets from whatever chain/asset pair to the ending chain/asset pair and you sign and we pay the gas.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
What are the current limitations and what are the long term limitations?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sheldon Trotman
@sheldon
With our solution: - current - in alpha, we only support lending on Aave, and staking with Rocketpool and Lido. Easily solvable since there’s 17 other protocols across 6 different chains we will integrate - long term - even deciding which type to do is scary/confusing, what if we can take that mental burden too😏
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ben - [C/x]
@benersing
Will give it a try
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
![Ben - [C/x] pfp](https://i.imgur.com/qdfZSol.gif)
