Waqas
@worqas
Americans are right about measuring temperature in Fahrenheit instead of Celsius.
4 replies
1 recast
12 reactions
Diñero
@gryphon
I don't understand why. Celsius is easier to comprehend
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Waqas
@worqas
It's not really. F provides higher resolution and human beings are pretty sensitive to temperature.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
shazow
@shazow.eth
it's 3 sigfigs either way, C provides higher resolution
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Waqas
@worqas
How? Freezing point in Fahrenheit: 32°F Freezing point in Celsius: 0°C Boiling point in Fahrenheit: 212°F Boiling point in Celsius: 100°C 212 – 32 = 180 100 – 0 = 100
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
there's this crazy thing called decimals
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Waqas
@worqas
Lol yes. But much research shows humans aren't that good at judging small decimal differences. Hence the higher resolution provided by F in terms of integers is useful.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow
@shazow.eth
So more resolution is good, but more more resolution is bad? I dunno, I'm starting to think Fahrenheit has too much resolution and that 2 sigfigs is more appropriate because humans aren't good at judging small differences. 🙃 I honestly think it's a silly vibes-based meme that doesn't hold up in practice. I've switched between the two systems back and forth, my partner has too as we've lived in different countries. It's all just cope to hang on to a bizarre 32-indexed counting system instead of going to 0-indexed.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Waqas
@worqas
What I am trying to say is that it's harder to imagine the difference between. 22.7778 C and 23.3333 C than the difference between 73 F and 74 F. It's just how human brains work, we round off things.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction