Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
I truly donā€™t know how to process Ben Thompsonā€™s essay today. Heā€™s been my steady source of clear-eyed tech takes for like 6 years now and this one feels like straight sci-fi. Iā€™m not an AI doomer, but Iā€™m def in my feelings rn šŸ˜© https://stratechery.com/2023/from-bing-to-sydney-search-as-distraction-s
9 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Avi šŸ’™ pfp
Avi šŸ’™
@savvyavi
Also, thisā€¦. https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/chatgpt-ai-messages-microsoft-bing-b2282491.html
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Lol fascinating tidbits but god itā€™s a nightmare trying to find the original sources in that piece šŸ˜‚
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Avi šŸ’™ pfp
Avi šŸ’™
@savvyavi
Thatā€™s intentional, I think.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Modern journalism šŸ™ƒ
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Avi šŸ’™ pfp
Avi šŸ’™
@savvyavi
Part of it might be to protect the sources for reasons that might not be clear to us now.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Iā€™d be much more inclined to take their ā€œjournalistic integrityā€ seriously if this wasnā€™t the miasma through which I must consume their content šŸ˜ https://i.imgur.com/TpBvUam.jpg
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Avi šŸ’™ pfp
Avi šŸ’™
@savvyavi
What is theyā€™re hackers? Iā€™m nit saying they are. But what if their entire intention is to find the vulnerable parts. Would you think itā€™s better to identify them?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Iā€™m not concerned about any individual ID, but w as close of a read as I think you can do of this article it just looks like summaries of Reddit and Twitter threads. The problem is deliberately inflammatory language to describe secondhand experiences and if youā€™re gonna do that the least you can do is cite your wor
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction