I truly don’t know how to process Ben Thompson’s essay today. 

He’s been my steady source of clear-eyed tech takes for like 6 years now and this one feels like straight sci-fi. 

I’m not an AI doomer, but I’m def in my feelings rn 😩

I truly don’t know how to process Ben Thompson’s essay today. 

He’s been my steady source of clear-eyed tech takes for like 6 years now and this one feels like straight sci-fi. 

I’m not an AI doomer, but I’m def in my feelings rn 😩

https://stratechery.com/2023/from-bing-to-sydney-search-as-distraction-s

weird internet kid. helping Creators with /seemore. yapping on /okbanger. curating in /cameron + pdfproject.org | dev + veteran + HBS. 
seemore.tv/cameron 🫡

Also, this….

https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/chatgpt-ai-messages-microsoft-bing-b2282491.html

Recovering Film Studio Exec l Psychology Nerd l Strategy Muse l Brand Builder l Also, “Culture eats strategy for breakfast.” - Peter Drucker   JoinSavvyAvi.com

Lol fascinating tidbits but god it’s a nightmare trying to find the original sources in that piece 😂

Part of it might be to protect the sources for reasons that might not be clear to us now.

I’d be much more inclined to take their “journalistic integrity” seriously if this wasn’t the miasma through which I must consume their content 😐 https://i.imgur.com/TpBvUam.jpg

I’m not concerned about any individual ID, but w as close of a read as I think you can do of this article it just looks like summaries of Reddit and Twitter threads. The problem is deliberately inflammatory language to describe secondhand experiences and if you’re gonna do that the least you can do is cite your wor

What is they’re hackers? I’m nit saying they are. But what if their entire intention is to find the vulnerable parts. Would you think it’s better to identify them?