phaver

being dependent on centralized platforms is like having a landlord that can evict you at anytime. 

posting to Lens and Farcaster with Phaver supergraph is like someone kicking the door in to hand over the deed for the place plus another holiday home in another country.

all while Zuck is watching this through his VR window, wondering where facebook went wrong

inb4 ”the ui/ux is not good enough yet to make people switch to web3 social” 

> would you choose to live in a literal digital prison and pay rent just because the walls are painted nice?

lets be free frens 🦾 the tech will improve

Growing @phaverapp ⚡️ the best app for cross-posting to farcaster & lens 🐦🐦🪨

$SOCIAL🦄

Well said boss 👏 
A quick proposal boss
@saska I feel like you should change your name to ‘𝑺𝒂𝒔𝒌𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆’

very valid point 

sure network effects are important, but they’ve always been one sided in web2 social

> profits for the platform, scraps for the users. 

for me it’s not just about scaling another social app but setting a foot down and flipping the script

with decentralized socials I think network effects can be reached even earlier as the difference is that users also gain value through
> ownership
> transparency
> data control
> monetization

rather than just forever feeding into the platform’s profits just for you to be banned one day and lose all your connections and those ”network effects”

but yeah agree that scaling is the biggest issue and probably why no one has nailed it yet

It’s not even that the walls need work

It’s a pure network effect game, the biggest challenge for latent social networks is that when they do get their shot, can they handle the load 

Most cannot so stumble on the actual moment that matters when a mass organic migration would happen 

Like a swarm of bees once the old hive can’t support them anymore, they will just cruise around until they can find a new home (or die out trying)